Pricing Privacy Act About Get Started Free
AUSTRAC compliance guide

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) — what Australian accountants need to know

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is a client who holds or has held a prominent public position. Under AUSTRAC's rules, PEPs are automatically considered higher risk — requiring enhanced due diligence and greater ongoing scrutiny.

What is a Politically Exposed Person?

A PEP is an individual who holds or has held a prominent public function — typically a senior government, judicial, military, or senior state-owned enterprise role. The concept exists because such individuals may have access to public funds and may face greater risk of bribery and corruption.

AUSTRAC defines PEPs to include:

Importantly, PEP status also extends to their immediate family members and close associates — spouses, children, parents, and business partners.

Why are PEPs higher risk?

PEPs don't represent illegal activity by definition — most PEP clients are entirely legitimate. The elevated risk stems from their access to government resources and the potential for corruption, bribery, or misuse of public funds to flow through professional service providers.

Key point: Being a PEP is not a red flag. It's a risk indicator that requires enhanced due diligence — more scrutiny, not automatic refusal.

How to identify PEPs in your client base

Manual identification of PEPs across a large client base is impractical. The standard approach is to screen clients against commercial PEP databases at onboarding and on an ongoing basis. These databases aggregate publicly available information about prominent public figures globally.

CompliDesk includes automated PEP screening as part of the KYC verification process — every new client is automatically checked, and existing clients are re-screened when databases are updated.

What enhanced due diligence (EDD) means for PEPs

If you identify a PEP client, you must apply enhanced due diligence. This means:

Former PEPs

Former PEPs — people who previously held prominent positions but no longer do — remain higher risk for a period after leaving office. AUSTRAC doesn't prescribe a specific time period, so you need to make a risk-based judgment. Most firms apply a 12–24 month post-exit enhanced scrutiny period as a minimum.

Manage AML compliance for all your clients from one dashboard

CompliDesk is built specifically for Australian professional services firms managing AML/CTF compliance for clients. Sign up free for free signup.

Sign up free today

PEPs — quick answers

No — PEP status triggers enhanced due diligence, not an automatic refusal. Many firms service PEP clients perfectly legitimately, provided the enhanced scrutiny (source of wealth documentation, senior management approval, closer ongoing monitoring) is genuinely applied.
It covers both domestic and foreign PEPs, as well as their immediate family members and close associates — a category often overlooked. An Australian state MP's spouse or business partner can also fall within scope.
There's no fixed cutoff in the Act — risk-based judgement applies, and many firms continue enhanced monitoring for a period after someone leaves a prominent position, since influence and associations don't necessarily end immediately with the role.